Is the party over?

Is metal transgressive?

Before breaking up in 2023, Dawn Ray’d were one of the most prominent Radical Anarchist black metal bands. The video for their song ‘Go as Free Companions’ features the band performing in what looks like an abandoned factory. It cuts to shots of people putting on black balaclavas and gloves, who slowly appear in shot alongside the band as the video progresses, brandishing signs that read “No one is illegal”, “Trans rights now!”, “Fight fascism” and “Liberate animals”. The comments section on YouTube – whilst predictably very critical of the band’s politics and their use of black metal to communicate it – is peppered with an interesting refrain addressing Dawn Ray’d’s relationship to transgression. One user claims that there’s “nothing more hardcore than seeing them hold a sign fight for trans rights…”, another saying that “yes because the world needs puritan hall monitor black metal”, or “this is like what happens when the principal has a band with the music teacher and a cop” (all typos reproduced intentionally).

This is an example of an essentially transgressive critique of Dawn Ray’d’s moral stance expressed by a conservative audience hostile to the progressive values championed in the video. Black metal, and indeed a lot of metal, has always stood on ambiguous political ground. To issue simple statements in support of refugees or anti-fascist sentiment in almost any other form of modern rock (bar country maybe) would be business as usual. But in the context of black metal it is seen as not only contrary to the norms of genre, but an act of conformism to establishment norms, of aligning with the perceived dominance of “woke” in the eyes of many black metal fans.

This is a microcosm of the tension that emerges whenever the left encroaches on artistic territory traditionally occupied by the right (or the politically chaotic). Radical Anarchist black metal attempts to coopt what it sees as a problematic artform and harness its transgressive power toward egalitarian ends. In the process, it was hoped that this would provide a safe space for potential leftwing millennial recruits reticent to engage with metal for reasons of moral hygiene. Dawn Ray’d clearly see themselves as championing minority, potentially transgressive, causes. But a section of black metal’s traditional fandom view this as “hall monitor black metal”. This is because, despite the fact that metal’s historical brand of edgelord vulgarity is now mainstream, it still sees itself as besieged. One of the reasons Trump’s brand of conservativism keeps succeeding is its ability to constantly position itself as outside the mainstream even when holding the highest seats of government. Trans rights and respect for refugees will always be seen as establishment moralising within this worldview.

This gets to the heart of metal’s “transgression” problem. The old enemies that would seek to police what metal can or cannot do are not dead, they just live on in the form of the woke mind virus. Nergal’s frequent run-ins with the Polish Catholic church are perhaps the only high profile after echoes of the traditional battles metal is used to, back when it went toe to toe with the PMRC in the 80s. Now, the moralising enemy is a woke mob who don’t want you to have any fun.

It should be noted that inverting the values of traditional religious conservatism still carries symbolic value in non-Western metal. I’d speculate that this is one of the reasons why music from South America, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East appears more vibrant and self-assured than their European and North American counterparts. The latter of which sidestep the problem of transgression by complicating the music into ever more esoteric and largely meaningless permutations of avant-garde, or resorting once again to the nostalgia lever.

The left’s impulse to invert the ideology of problematic music in order to freely play with its forms has been artistically embarrassing and politically disastrous. In attempting to transpose a specific value nexus onto a politically chaotic yet proudly artisanal and often ascetic subculture, the younger progressive wing of metal has replicated in microcosm the political failures of its generation.

In order to repair some of the damage done by this project, it will be necessary to subject transgression within metal to a paradigm shift, one that is already well underway outside its borders.

Read the full article over on Substack.

11 thoughts on “Is the party over?

Add yours

  1. (I haven’t read the full article because it’s paywalled.)

    I know I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again — looking specifically at “transgression” is the wrong lens for understanding extreme metal. The intersections between rebellion/transgression and extreme metal are entirely coincidental to its true nature of being Satanic in the sense of being harmful, destructive, disastrous, pernicious, baleful, malicious, mischievous, and sly. It glorifies the trial and tribulation, the fear and the death. This is why it is consistently at odds with modern leftist politics (which are an inherently utopian venture), but also why, aside from a few Polish bands and Absurd’s first album and EP, explicit NSBM has generally been an epic fail.

    “Night is so beautiful/We need her as much as we need day” isn’t an agenda that lends itself towards comfy relationships with politics of any stripe.

    Also, there’s a nice bit of comedy in rumored police snitch Nergal being cast as a rebel of any sort!

    Like

  2. I haven’t read the Substack so I might be missing some nuance, but from over where I am sitting, there’s long been this anarcho punk black metal fan faction that have loved the sounds of BM, but sit in tension with the racist/cruel elements. Looking deep into the crusty CD shelf and finding a bit of BM… it’s there. The attempts by lefty sorts to occupy any space in the sonic drabness of BM have all sounded forced, weird and boring. Like, you already have stadium punk / d-beat, what do you need to some over here and do different blast beats for?

    I, personally, think that all overly direct political messaging in music is a bit naff. This is as true for punk as it is for NSBM.

    Also, it’s very cute to think that a cop would care about animal rights, that’s cute as fuck.

    Like

  3. Transphobia is a multi-million dollar neocon psyop. Hardly anything is lamer and more conformist than being a transphobe. Rainbow capitalism is cringe and more than deserving of criticism, and I would unironically rather listen to Brokencyde than Dawn Ray’d or Venom Prison. But the rampant swarm of boomercon culture warriors need to be kicked out of metal as swiftly and decisively as possible. Send them all back to Kid “I Like ‘Em Underage” Rock.

    Like

    1. “Transphobia is a multi-million dollar neocon psyop.” is so revisionist it’s crazy. I lived through the 1990s and 2000s, when SRS was just starting to become semi-common, and it was seen by most people as being creepy and weird as hell from the start. Accusations of transexuality were used as insults from both left wing and right wing sources (just look at all of the leftist critics of the era pointing out Ann Coulter’s Adam’s apple — we all know the implications of that), “the hot chick is packing a third leg/used to be a man!” was a common plot on late ’90s/early 2000s sitcoms played for disgust, Bakla was one of the most notorious of the early shock sites. It’s not the right wing who has been pushing to change the status quo on that one for the last decade.

      Like

      1. I’m not talking about humorous banter or shit talk. I shit-talk every ethnicity, religion, nationality, gender, etc. under the sun on a regular basis; as do most people, I’m sure. Everyone who doesn’t live under a rock recalls that, over the past five to ten years, neocons have aggressively opposed transgender rights and have poured millions into spreading a moral panic that portrays transgender people as devil-worshiping child rapists.

        Also, funny how one can always spot “babby’s first r/stupidpol lurk” when some rube tries to gussy up shopworn groyper talking points with entry-level “Marxist” jargon.

        Like

      2. Yeah, if you’re going to continue shifting the goalposts from the ongoing multi-million dollar crusade against transgender rights and moral smear campaign against trans people via the neocon mainstream media, politicians and unfathomably well-heeled megadonors, to unfalsifiable hearsay concerning casual attitudes toward trans people, then there is no point in continuing to reply. But one last thing I will point out, is that the question of whether personal dating preferences can be harmfully prejudicial, was the product of one (otherwise fairly obscure) content creator – who is nowhere near the same level of power and influence as formerly Epstein-affiliated Zionist shills, US President Trump and world’s richest man Elon Musk, or other well-heeled mouthpieces for the neocon psyop – but hack neoconservative talking heads ran with it, uncharitably caricatured her argument as “you’re a bad person if you won’t fuck a trans person” and used it as another jumping-off point to spark rabid, paranoiac hatred against trans people, spreading the narrative that “men in dresses” are constantly lurking in wait under the bed to rape your children. (Interestingly enough, the useful idiots swilling this neocon Kool-Aid don’t seem to mind IOF soldiers prancing around for social media in the bra and panties of women and girls whom they have recently raped and murdered.)

        Like

      3. Yes, saying that transphobia didn’t exist prior to the silly bathroom laws and then saying “no, I only meant one very specific political manifestation of transphobia, not an actual mental state (which is what various <word>phobia words actually refer to)!” and then bringing up Israel (???) is totally not moving the goalposts.

        You don’t happen to be Falconsbane/SeditionAndPockets, do you?

        Like

    2. This response is months late – but my initial point was that there is nothing trangressive or edgy about transphobia, when neoconservative entities from the highest echelons of institutional power have poured millions into promoting a noxious, paranoiac smear campaign against transgender people and transgender rights. “P. B.” rebutted this by claiming that the majority considers trans people weird – which, although clearly an exaggeration, may have a kernel of truth to it, given the colonial globalization of Judeo-Christian moral shibboleths. But I wasn’t originally addressing the casual, passing prejudices of “normies,” but the scores of well-heeled reactionary hustlers and demagogues who’ve made it their bread and butter portraying transgender people as nefarious and imminently dangerous sexual predators and perverts, as well as the incessant swarm of internet no-names (such as “P. B.”) who’ve guzzled the aforementioned Kool-Aid and spend all their time spewing their histrionic, obsessive vitriol against trans people in every social media comment section. But were it not for the fact that such muckracking legitimizes legal discrimination and physical violence against trans people, it would be a cause for rejoicing to be labeled as “weird” or “creepy” by the latter faction, considering what constitutes the transphobe’s “normal” – which includes the idolization of Donald Trump (who almost certainly aided Mossad asset Jeffrey Epstein in the sexual trafficking of children, and is currently abetting a genocide), arguably the prime mover of the recent and ongoing anti-trans movement; as well as Andrew Tate (who bragged on camera that he first pimped out his “main hoe” when she was still underage) and other pedophiles who traffic in the cretinous fad of demonizing trans people, such as Matt Gaetz, Nick Fuentes, Ian Miles Cheong… The list goes on and on, but to sum up my point, the elite neocons’ abusive and stigmatizing smears against transgender people appear to be a cut-and-dried case of psychological projection, and it is a great compliment to be deemed weird by transphobes, given that what and whom transphobes deem normal and praiseworthy is, in fact, unimaginably reprehensible.

      Like

  4. Boomercons are worse for metal than NSBM, because at least most NSBM artists know they don’t represent or speak for metal as a whole. Plus, many NSBM bands make great music, whereas boomercons make laughable, irredeemable tripe like Ironic Punishment Division and Tougher Than Nails.

    Like

    1. Boomercons can’t make good metal for the exact same reason leftists generally can’t — both are utopian projects, and metal is explicitly anti-utopian.

      Like

Leave a reply to drowningrose Cancel reply

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑